Fanny Pack Mother Lode

  • updated: 3/7/24 with 2 new bag reviews

Since I use this site to spread info and not get clicks or traffic, I’m going to brain dump everything I know about fanny pack carry. I’m going to cover my history with fanny packs, their use case, their downsides, pistol requirements and considerations, draw stroke, and a review of every fanny pack I’ve owned. I’ve been carrying in fanny packs intermittently since 2008 and almost exclusively since 2020. Here’s how I got into fanny pack carry. 

I first started considering using a fanny pack in 2008. I watched Jay Gibson of Tactical Response show up to the range with his Maxpedition Octa full of Glock 19 with big dots and teach part of Fighting Pistol with it. I was very early in my shooting career, but I noted how easy and unobtrusive the fanny pack seemed to be for toting irrespective of dress. Paul Gomez (Rest In Peace), also occasionally used fanny packs and gave me some good pointers on choosing one. He taught me to buy the most tourist/normie fanny pack color and design I could, and if possible apply some national park patches to it to look like a hiker rather than a cop. He actually made a video about some of his ideas. These two guys, who I highly respected, used them, so why shouldn’t I be able to?



For a long time, fanny packs either meant cop or dork. I was resistant to using them for anything but dog walks, hiking, or camping, but fanny packs as an accessory have come back into fashion and wearing one isn’t out of place in 2024. Starting in 2020, I decided that since I was doing a lot of gardening, mostly wearing sweatpants, and that I didn’t have the patience for a belt, I committed to fanny pack life. Now that I’m back to coaching Jiu Jitsu, I rarely have the need for a traditional kydex holster and belt. If I do need a real holster, I use my PHLSTER Enigma to still allow beltless concealed carry.

I say all that to say, I have been accumulating opinions on fanny packs for quite a while, and have lived with them daily since early 2020. I’ll share my thoughts with you here.


Addressing the Off-Body Carry Elephant


Technically a fanny pack is considered “OFF BODY” carry, since the bag is visible and can be easily removed. For several important reasons, off-body carry is less than ideal. 

  • The first big issue is that off-body bags themselves are the target of a theft because of their usual contents (think purse, shoulder sling bag, gym bag, backpack, etc). 
  • The second issue, related to the first, is that people constantly remove their off-body carry bag depending on their environment. Purses go in shopping carts, backpacks get put in a spare chair or under the desk, sling bags get draped over a restaurant chair, etc. This opens them up for theft as well as unauthorized access (children being my biggest concern). 
  • Lastly, off-body guns are slower to access, often requiring two hands. There is also the likelihood that the bag has changed orientation relative to your body, requiring your visual attention to index the bag before you can even start accessing the gun. 

That said, there is certainly a time and place for off-body carry if you understand the possible drawbacks and avoid user error.

The good news is that a fanny pack doesn’t share the same drawbacks as other forms of off-body carry. The pack stays on your body, doesn’t shift as you move, and can be accessed one handed in a variety of positions. I’d argue that fanny packs are in the middle ground of Off-Body and Concealed Carry. It allows the comfort and versatility of off-body carry with the ability to readily access your gun in a very congruent manner to an appendix carry setup. It also allows a convenient way to carry support gear and keep your pockets from bulging. Some would argue that they are the worst of both worlds but that’s just a matter of perspective, fashion sense, and needs.

When is a fanny pack a convenient way to carry?

I will always default to the most comfortable and convenient way to carry, when balanced against the dress requirements, level of visual scrutiny expected, perceived threat level, and gun requirement I have for a given situation. Here’s a quick list of times that a fanny pack is an ideal way to carry:

  • Yard Chores
  • Dog walks/ Hiking
  • Shopping Trips
  • Around the house (They allow me to carry more gun at home VS an Underwear Gun)
  • Globo-Gym workout (If I squat, I’ll place the bag in front of me within arms reach, otherwise it stays on)
  • Road Trips
  • Whenever I’m beltless (Gi pants, gym shorts, sweats)
  • Whenever I need to be able to comfortably bend at the waist
American Go-THICC

What don’t they do?

Fanny packs are slower to draw from than concealed IWB carry, which is slower than open carry, which is slower than just walking around with a pistol in your hand. That said, I don’t sweat a 1-2 second penalty on my draw time. If the shooting problem is directed toward me at contact distance, drawing on an aimed gun is a losing battle and is likely a grappling problem first. If the problem allows any distance stand-off, verbal or visual deception, or physical movement, the time penalty becomes less important. Either way, I just don’t sweat the time penalty very much. I’d like to be the first person to take a fanny pack through Shivwork’s ECQC.

Fanny packs draw more visual attention and could raise questions. For this problem, I always choose the least tactical color available and have even sewn outdoor equipment patches or national park patches to make it look less scary. I also have a canned response if someone asks what I keep in there. I tell them it’s my insulin and blood sugar testing supplies (I’m not diabetic, but I’m stealing valor). I also prefer getting the smallest footprint pack I can find that is appropriately sized for the gun I expect to carry. 

What does a CCW fanny pack need to do?

Similar to how a ‘safe’ IWB holster has several requirements:

  • Allow a full firing grip on the gun while holstered
  • Keep its shape to allow one handed holstering
  • Adequately protect the trigger while holstered
  • Stay in place on the belt

 So too does a useful fanny pack. Here are my requirements:

  • Has a dedicated gun slot which keeps errant chapstick and keys from touching triggers
  • Keeps the gun oriented and indexed reliably
  • Allows one handed opening of bag and draw of the gun
  • The bag sufficiently protects the trigger or has a velcro field to attach a nylon loop holster or attachment points to dummy cord a kydex trigger guard holster

What are the pistol requirements for a fanny pack?

Unlike other holsters which you buy to fit the exact gun you carry, fanny packs require more careful pistol selection. I tend to not bother with an internal nylon loop holster or kydex trigger guard, so I will only carry Double Action pistols, Revolvers, or safety-equipped single action guns. Currently, I prefer to carry my Sig P365XL with safety, but I’ve carried a number of guns in fanny packs over the years to include K and J-frame revolvers, Glock 19, Smith Shield, Beretta PX4c, and some others. If you decide to carry a glock or plastic gun without a manual safety, I strongly recommend a kydex trigger guard which you will dummy cord to the body of the fanny pack. Keep the dummy cord as short as possible, or you will have an extra long vertical draw before the kydex rips free. Large heavy guns like Beretta 92s *can* be carried in fanny packs, but the weight and footprint of the fanny pack starts to become a tell.

Tips and Tricks

Here are a few tips to help you set up your fanny pack to be useful in the widest set of circumstances:

  • If you have a pack that uses zipper pulls, I highly recommend changing the main pistol zipper pull to something that is both thicker and longer than the other pull tabs on the other zippers. This allows no-look indexing of the zipper pull with your hands while your eyes are on more important matters. I have purchased longer cloth pull tabs and have braided paracord into box weave pulls. 
  • Close your pistol zippers at the top right corner (for right handed shooters) and your other pockets at the left side. This prevents accidental opening of the pistol pocket when you’re going for your wallet or chapstick. Closing at the top right also allows a single movement to the left for access which lowers the chances of hanging up at the 90 degree turn in the zipper path. 
  • Another way to set up a zipper bag is to run a long stiff cloth pull from inside the bag and let it peek through the slight opening in the two closed zippers. This gives you a single point to grab and rip away from your body, which simultaneously pulls both zippers in the process. I also generally prefer the pistol to lay at a 45-degree angle in the pouch, which allows a more natural wrist angle on the draw, but this is bag dependent. 
  • Lastly, if you find a fanny pack design you like, but at least one spare. These are niche carry items, and everyone tries to put their spin on them. So it’s hard to find another one that has the features you value the most. I only have two of the KG Products discontinued model and I wish I had 4 of them.

How to draw from a fanny pack

I wrote this in 2016, and it’s still perfectly adequate to explain the draw: https://www.growingupguns.com/2016/08/29/technique-draw-from-a-fanny-pack/

The most important detail is that the draw stroke is the same as when using a IWB holster once you get a full firing grip on the gun in the bag. So your fanny pack should allow acquiring the full firing grip in the fewest possible steps. Be aware of your muzzle on the draw, as it is possible to flag your off hand as you clear the bag. I tend to retract my elbow and let my pistol track towards a retention shooting position (thumb-pectoral index), which keeps the muzzle pointed down and away from my off hand while I draw.

Bags I’ve used

Top: Bianchi, Maxpedition Middle: Tommy’s Gun, KG Products Bottom: Eberlestock, HPG

Here’s a list of the fanny packs I’ve used, and a simple rating and explanation of features:

The Shield Arms Junk Sack – 5 / 5 https://www.shieldarms.com/shop/category/soft-goods-bags-junk-sack-275

This is the speed rig of fanny packs. It uses rare earth magnets (how do they work?) and side velcro for closure. There is a fabric handle that allows easy indexing without having to look down, and a sharp yank forward opens the gun compartment. Exactly like the discontinued KG Products pack that I loved so much. This is the modern solution to a no-look one-handed fanny pack draw. The gun compartment holds my P365 and a small TQ in a pouch at the bottom. Perfect solution for me. The storage pouch is just a little smaller than I’d prefer, but uses a stretchy fabric that accommodates the essentials. This one gets my highest recommendation. Get one and try it.

VERTX SOCP tactical fanny pack. 4.5 / 5 https://vertx.com/socp-tactical-fanny-pack

It’s big. It reminds me of the 90’s cop fanny packs that people recognize as gun bags. BUT, if you need extra space, for either a larger gun or more gear, it seems like a good option. The zipper gun closure is the industry standard approach, and has all the drawbacks I outlined in my post. There is a dedicated external phone pouch that doubles as a viewing sleeve so you can watch Rich Piana’s 8 hour arm workout videos while you eat cheetos. There are good organization slots in the cargo pocket, with plenty of room for daily needs as well as a some medical gear. It can accommodate a g19 with optic and muzzle brake, as opposed to most of the others I’ve reviewed in which my P365xl with dot and 15 round mag is a snug fit. It also has some webbing on the body facing side which would be perfect for attaching a punch dagger or similar fixed blade knife. It’s really good, it’s just not perfect for my needs at the moment.

Eberlestock BANDO bag 4 / 5 https://eberlestock.com/products/bando-bag

This one is brand new to me as of early January 2024. It is laid out very similar to the Hill People Gear Snubby belt bag that I’ve used for several years. There are some design choices that I like more than the HPG bag. For one, there is no dust flap over the gun pocket. This prevents the possibility of the dust flap jamming up the zipper when you aggressively yank the zipper pull, which has happened to me. The volume of the bag feels slightly smaller, but the footprint and slightly domed shape looks more like hiking gear than the cubical shape of the HPG. I also like the elastic TQ keeper band in the upper flap of the utility compartment and zippered mesh divider for keeping things more organized. The elastic and velcro muzzle loop works very well at keeping the pistol oriented properly, but has enough give to allow a natural draw path without hanging up the pistol on the way out.

I don’t like the fact that there is only one pull on the utility portion of the bag, and that it only opens from the right side. This creates a small jungle of pull loops in the same area, which only creates confusion when you draw. This is another reason to buy or make a distinctly sized and shaped zipper pull for your main gun zipper. I probably will also try to make a pull tab that attaches inside the gun slot so I can pull a single tab and get both zippers to open at once, as mentioned in the tips and tricks section. I’ll know more in a few months of use. I’d also like to see a slightly larger tooth size on the gun compartment zipper. I’ll mention that more in my “dream fanny pack” section below.

LAPG FRUNK 2 / 5 https://snp.link/8a7a5ce6

This was a run of cheapo fanny packs that LA Police gear released a couple of years ago. They were thinner nylon and only had one main pocket with a velcro backing to accommodate a nylon loop holster. The front accessory pocket couldn’t hold a phone and wallet. For this reason, it doesn’t have much utility for keeping your pockets clear. But they were less than $25, so they were a cheap intro into fanny packs. This one would make a good medical fanny pack for range work, or a dedicated dog walking bag. I gave mine to my sister.

Maxpedition OCTA Versipak 2 / 5 https://amzn.to/48XcyPM

My first fanny pack for carry. It’s made of heavy 1000D cordura. The downside is that there is only one main pocket, and a front zip pocket. So while you can carry a pistol in it, there isn’t much room for anything else. This one would make a good medical fanny pack for range work.

KG Products (discontinued) 4.5 / 5

My favorite fanny pack ever. It had a dedicated gun pocket that was sealed with velcro, and kept shut by a single snap button at the corner. This was the closest thing to a gross motor draw as I have found in a fanny pack. You would grab a bunch of material near the button closure, and rip forward. It was only set up for right-handed shooters, which suited me fine. The utility pocket and front zip pocket was enough for wallet, phone, light, and some medical equipment. 

The main downside of this bag was a lack of rigidity, molle, or velcro field in the body-contacting panel of the gun section. As a result, the bag tended to sag away from the body, making it appear larger than it needed to be. Velcro also has a lifespan and eventually starts to wear out, so the closure eventually becomes more prone to opening on its own.

Spiritus Systems Fanny SACK 2 / 5 https://snp.link/871743fb

While a sought after brand for chest rigs and such, this one wasn’t really designed for pistol carry. Just like the Maxpedition OCTA, it only had the main large pocket. Once again, this one would be perfect for a man purse or range medical bag.

Bianchi Top Secret Fanny Pack (discontinued) 1 / 5 

This is the style of fanny pack that people who were around in the 90’s would say screams “COP”!. The footprint is very large across the hips. The secret gun pocket is closed with velcro only. The upside is it had mirrored ambidextrous velcro closures. The downside is that the opening required a nearly horizontal draw to clear. Poorly designed bag in my opinion. The body contact panel was a comfortable and semi-rigid foam and could accommodate glock 17 sized pistols, but you can only fit a K-frame revolver inside of it. I don’t get it.

Galco Fastrax PAC 1 / 5

This one looks cool on paper, but it failed at one of my main requirements. Galco kindly sent me one of these in early 2020 for T&E. I wish I would have liked it more. The form factor of the bag was very small. So small in fact, that the gun must lay horizontal in the bag, and there is an integral pivoting holster that requires you to tug on a tab to get the gun to pivot 90 degrees upward to allow you to get a firing grip. So you have to unzip the bag (1st action), and then find another small pull tab to yank and pivot the internal holster (2nd action). As a result, not only do you have to dexterously find two small pieces of fabric to pull, you also must use two hands to keep the holster vertical long enough to make a full firing grip. Fully a non-starter if you understand how an up close fight can go. It is like a Rube Goldberg machine for pistols. That and the gun could sometimes hang up on the flaps of the zipper as it pivoted. I liked that they were trying something different, but this one was a flop for me.

Hill People Gear Belt Pack Snubby 4 / 5 https://hillpeoplegear.com/Products/CategoryID/1/ProductID/129

This one was a long time companion. It can hold a SIG p365 with red dot and smaller guns. The front utility pocket was enough to hold a phone, wallet, gum, flashlight. The front flat pocket could hold some medical gear. The shape was cubic, which looks slightly more tactical than other styles (a negative). It worked well and is a good size. They now make a slightly larger size that probably would be even better for comfortably holding other odds and ends.

There were several things I didn’t like about this bag. The biggest one was the zipper setup. They used a relatively fine-toothed zipper, which requires more force and is more prone to gumming up when exposed to lots of dirt. I’d love to see them make this with a larger toothed zipper pull for the gun pocket. The other notable negative is the dust protection flap over the zipper. If the wind is right and there’s a full moon, the zipper will eat the dust flap, locking the zipper in place preventing your draw. That’s bad juju. I never got around to cutting it away, but that’s probably a good idea if you try one. Overall a good pack. 

Tommy’s Gun Pack (discontinued) 4 / 5

I have about 10 months of use on this discontinued bag. I really like how they did the gun access on this one. They used wide big toothed zippers, which clear dirt and unzip smoothly and easily. The right side FASTEX buckle acts as the pull tab that pulls the zippered gun compartment open. When you pinch the buckle, some clever nylon routing pulls at the zippers which the user stages at the top right corner of the pouch. Yanking forward peels the gun compartment open. One handed access is simple.

This pack is nearly too wide to look like a sports fanny pack. It teeters on the “COP!” end of the scale, similar to the Bianchi. The FASTEX buckles can also become brittle and break with wear. The way the nylon is routed in that buckle would make replacing it quite tricky. Overall a very good pack if you can find one on EBAY.

Wilderness DB Defender 3 / 5 https://www.thewilderness.com/waist-pack-holsters/db-defender-waist-pack/

EDIT 3/7/24: I was able to recently try one of these. My hands-on opinion is the same as my opinion formed from looking at the layout on their website. The gun pocket is a bit too thick (front-to back), and the storage pocket is a bit too small. It’s very well made, as is all of The Wilderness’ gear. It’s “OK”, but it’s not my first recommendation.

I was just made aware of these and haven’t handled one yet. I know DB puts a lot of thought into his gear, so I’m sure this one works well. It has some useful holster attachment options and what looks like plenty of space for different width guns. I like that there isn’t a dust flap over the zipper to get snagged on. I like the flat rear pocket and front utility pocket.

I believe there are some design features that could be reorganized to be even better. The gun pocket zipper is shaped in an arch, where I’d prefer a straight pull zipper to cut down on the possibility of binding the zipper on the draw as you rip the zipper open as the cloth softens over time. I’d like to see a thinner gun section, which might better stabilize and squeeze the pistol and prevent it from flopping forward in the pocket (a problem I had with the KG Products pack). This likely wouldn’t be a concern if you use the holster keeper options it comes with. Some of that reclaimed real-estate could be donated to the front utility pocket along with that arch shaped zipper. This would allow easier access to day to day items. But again, I haven’t handled one and it might be perfect as is.

The Perfect Fanny Pack

If I knew how to sew, or if you do, here’s how I would lay out the perfect pistol fanny pack. Let’s do some business together. 

  • It would be very similar in shape to the KG products or Eberlestock bag. 
  • The body side panel would have laser cut velcro/molle and paracord loops at the bottom to allow a variety of holster accessories as well as afford padding and stiffness to the bag. 
  • The front facing side of the gun section should also be stiffened in some way. The gun section would be a rectangular prism, about as thick as a G19, but no wider. This would hug the pistol and prevent sagging and flopping away from the body, and keep the weight of the front pouch from causing it to sag away from the body.
  • It would have a velcro closure that ran where the top and right side zipper usually do and be secured at the top right corner by a snap or 3. This would make the gun section invisible, stay secure, and be operable with one hand via yanking it forward aggressively.
  • If it instead had zippers, it wouldn’t have a dust flap and it would be a beefy zipper width to open quickly and clear dirt. 
  • There would be an integral pull loop which would attach at the bottom-left front of the gun section and hang out of the bag by a couple of inches. It would be covered in velcro or have a snap located near the top-right to keep the zippers from separating in day to day movement. A single sharp forward pull would open the snaps and unzip the bag for access. 
  • Conversely, you could forgo the pull tab and just put a single snap exactly at the top-right (and top-left) which would keep the bag closed, but quickly rip open if you yank the bag forward.
  • It would have an adequate storage area for a phone, flashlight, keys, and wallet and perhaps a front flat pocket which went low enough in the front to tuck in a TQ where it would effectively sit below the main utility pouch in the front. 

The rest is just details.

Thanks for reading, now please never ask me about fanny packs again.

S&W Shield VS Sig P365XL – By the Numbers

I’ve owned a Smith Shield since they were released in 2012. The shield was a game changer and huge upgrade from the other single stack 9mm guns on the market. My Shield replaced the Kel Tec PF9 that I carried in my engineering job in some manner of deep concealment. In the subsequent years, the micro 9 class of guns exploded and many competitors were introduced. None of them really tickled my fancy enough to justify spending my own money on ‘upgrading’.

Enter the Sig P365XL in June of 2019. It offered features that no other micro 9 had been able to deliver on, and features that I qualitatively perceived as worthy of the upgrade. This post will be sort of an evaluation and comparison in features, performance, costs, and a discussion of the intangibles. I’m basically just trying to justify the purchase to myself and you’re along for the ride.

A day of shooting some tests quickly cuts through “feelings” about how a gun performs.

The Guns

The guns I’m comparing are different states of ‘upgraded’. The Sig P365XL is bone stock. The gen 1 Smith Shield has been incrementally upgraded over time and I’ll catalog those upgrades here.

The Sig comes with excellent 3-dot tritium night sights, good grip texture, a usable thumb safety (can be had without), a flared magwell (minimize pinching on mag insert), a flat faced trigger, a factory 15(!) round magazine, and has an optics mounting plate. I paid $525 for mine locally. Most of the online vendors have it for full retail of $575.

SIG SAUER P365XL 9MM OPTIC READY | Brownells

The shield has several upgrades that I have chosen over the years to make it more usable for me. The stock shield is currently $300 if you’re patient or $400 on any other given day. I added some Ameriglo Pro-Glo sights ($73 currently), APEX sear ($40), TALON grip panel ($20) to aid in the bar of soap feel of the gen 1s, Mag Guts +2 spring/follower upgrade gets me 10+1 in the gun ($32). I feel like all of these upgrades get the shield on par with the P365XL. I, of course, paid full MSRP when it came out in 2012, but I wanted to compare these two guns at current pricing. The grand total is $565 ($465 if you’re patient) in 2020. So we have a gun with similar features, a similar size, 68% of the ammo capacity with aftermarket spring and basepad, and costs $10 less ($110 if you find a deal) than the P365XL. So is it worth saving $10 once we look at performance, features, and ergonomics? Let’s see.

S&W M&P Shield 2.0 9mm Pistol With No Safety, Black – 11808

Performance

If you’ve been following me for any length of time, you know that I put a lot of weight into numbers. That’s the mechanical engineer in me. It’s also what creates my disdain for most gun reviews. I wrote about that here. When I was doing my Hot-Rod J-frame project, I wanted a good way to quantify the performance improvements that various components would deliver in small revolvers. I wanted a way to compare the important attributes of defensive shooting, at realistic self-defense distances, with enough resolution to see trends.

I wanted to look at several aspects of ‘good shooting’ when it comes to my testing. I’m interested in pure accuracy, without the pressure of time. Pure speed, without a strict pressure of accuracy. Lastly, a blend of speed and accuracy/precision. I wanted to use targets that I could print on my printer. I also wanted to keep the total round count under 50 rounds because ammo is expensive and time is limited.

TEST 1: Pure Accuracy Test

10 shots at 15yds on a B8, no time limit

TEST 2: “5 yard Roundup”

four strings of fire, all at 5 yds, shot on B8, each with a time limit of 2.5 seconds.

Scoring is by the rings on the target for the ten shots, equaling a possible 100 points. Hits off of the ten-inch repair center minus ten each. Late hits are five points are deducted per late shot.

String 1: One Shot From the Holster (I used muzzle on table, support hand high on chest. Copying hand position of the draw since my range doesn’t allow holster work)

String 2: Four Shots From the Ready

String 3: Three Shots From Strong-Hand-Only Ready

String 4: Two Shots From Support-Hand-Only Ready

TEST 3: “HITS SUPER SNUB TEST” – B8 repair center, all shot from low ready

10 Yards – 5 shots in 8 seconds. Two hands

5 Yards – 5 shots in 5 seconds. Two hands

3 Yards – 5 shots in 3 seconds. Strong hand only.

TEST 4: As Fast As Possible – Snubbie Bill Drill

5 shots, 5 yards, on full piece of paper, take average split time.

B8 repair center for you to download:B-8 (1)Download

Results

“Virtually Identical” – Mike Goldberg

I couldn’t ask for a more evenly matched set of scores. For this to be more meaningful, I’d run the tests at least three times, and with at least three different shooters. But I’d wager that we’d see the scores fall very close to each other after all that. Besides, I don’t have any friends to ask to shoot the tests. So let’s just agree that they are *very* similar when it comes to performance. And it’s no wonder as they have a similar sight radius, similar sight picture, similar grip length, and similar trigger feel. They are similar enough that there isn’t much difference in the performance output.

Optics Ready

I’ll be honest. I’ve been waiting to jump on a red dot equipped pistol for the last few years. I was stalling because of rich pricing on the RDS that were quality enough to trust, and because it seemed only full sized striker guns were coming equipped to accept them. I’m not really a striker guy anymore. Nor am I a full sized gun guy much anymore.

This 365XL is sort of a compromise. I’m not happy that it’s a striker gun. But at least it has a usable thumb safety. It is a slim 9 that can be carried in gym shorts. It is an optics ready gun which several companies are making custom slim footprint optics for. It does punch above its weight class in ammo capacity and ‘shootability’. It’s a bigger gun masquerading as a smaller gun. And for me, that was worth trying it out.

As an aside, did you guys hear that SCCY is releasing an optics equipped DAO small 9mm? I hate that I’m interested, but I’m interested.

This soon to be released HOLOSUN 507K is just brilliant and pushed my purchase.

New! Holosun HS507K Red Dot Sight , Color: Black, Battery Type: CR1632, 15% Off w/ Free S&H

What Does Average Joe Need In A Trigger? 5 Years Later

In 2015, I wrote a blog post that addressed some thoughts I was having about what type of pistol best fit my life. I was processing exactly what I needed a pistol to do for me, in my life, for my situation. That post was my way of getting through the inertia of over ten years of Glock 19s and heavy indoctrination into having to find the perfect, easy to shoot fast, competition/carry trigger. Shortly after that post, I believed my own idea and started investing in and learning (and attempting to master) Double Action and Traditional Double Action pistols in various size envelopes. This post will highlight my mental map that led me to where I am today.

Current Underwear Gun and gym shorts options: smith 640, LCR, and LCP

Full Circle

I find myself going full circle on a lot of things in my life. I could write a post about this, but I’ll give a relevant example here. I started my firearms training under instructors that were trying to build a strong foundation of self-defense in a two day class. As a result of the scope of those classes, there isn’t much time to talk about, much less use, shot timers and discuss progressive improvement in shooting skills or competition. So I left those early classes with too much confidence and not knowing what I didn’t know regarding time pressure.

Then I fell into circles who were skilled competitors and instructors who taught me that time matters and being faster than the other guy wins fights. So I mocked the no-timer-guys and was on a mission to go fast(er). I got really wrapped up in the timer and achieving what I now view as “meaningless degrees of precision” in score and time. It is really easy to get wrapped up in the timer once you discover it.

Now, after thinking about this a lot for the last few years, and listening to people who have been thinking about this for entire careers, I am somewhere in the middle. Speed matters, to a point and at certain times. (Meaningful) Precision is my primary performance goal with enough speed to ride the edge of assessment of my shooting. This fact leaves a lot of room for DA guns in my life.

Training time is another factor. Dry fire is free. I can practice the most important shooting skills for free at home. I can learn a new trigger style at home for free. The Pareto principle applies. For me to squeak out a .02 second split time improvement below say .25 seconds would take an inordinate amount of time and money. It also might be counterproductive to self defense, as I mention below. As a multi-disciplinary practitioner, that time is better spent getting my 80/20 under the bar, on the mats, or meal prepping. You have to dive deep enough into each facet of this thing, but not too deep or you’ll neglect something else. But that might be another post.

The Discontinued P250 (sadly), and a Beretta 92a1 with some Wilson goodies.

What does a defensive gun need to do?

Since we have to live with and around our guns a whole lot more than we have to shoot them, some weight should be given to ‘margin of safety’ in our pistol’s function. Those little mechanical assists that cover for us when we have a lapse in concentration or are otherwise overwhelmed my the situation unfolding before us. It’s worth considering that the most dangerous thing we do with our guns, statistically speaking, is administrative handling. Specifically holstering. Keep in mind that 98-100% (by time) of our interactions with a gun will be administrative.

In order of importance, a self defense gun should facilitate:
1- Not shooting ourselves
2- Not shooting people we don’t want to shoot
3-Shooting what we want to shoot

Then I took to heart Darryl Bolke’s requirements of a handgun that only ask for, “Sights I can see, a trigger I can manage, in a reliable package.” This isn’t a big ask and leaves a lot of options available, including DA guns and revolvers.

Timers and Scoring still play a role. You have to know where you are.

…But your split times are slower!

Then I learned about assessment speed (and reaction times via Bill Rogers) and how it’s possible to “out-drive your headlights” and shoot faster than you can process the impact of your shots on your target. I learned that LAPD SWAT trains to .5 second splits to allow good hits and proper assessment. This made me less anxious about moving away from striker guns and towards double action guns.

Since I can’t think and react faster than about .25 seconds (and nor can you), why should I seek a defensive gun that I can shoot faster just for faster’s sake. It didn’t make sense for me. Detractors say, “If you can shoot .17 splits, then shooting .3 second splits becomes easier”. This of course is true. Moving the ultimate ceiling of your speed higher will make all slower cadences easier. To paraphrase Darryl Bolke again, once you can shoot .25 splits at self-defense ranges on a grapefruit sized target reliably, you have all the speed you “need”. I’m content to trust his experience and not worry about finding a gun that allows me .19 second splits and trade away a ‘safer’ trigger.

The Barami Hipgrip (which I textured). While designed for behind the hip, this does pretty well Appendix. Note that there’s enough grip sticking up to get a firing grip. Pairs well with a Tyler T-Grip.

…But you’re NoT AS aCcUrAtE

Consider The Most Important Shot in defensive shooting. This, of course, is the draw to first shot. After this, things get much more hectic. So I strove to build and hone my draw and first shot on my DA guns. I learned to Fear Not The Double Action Shot, as Ernest Langdon explained. Just knowing that people can be highly competitive and winning with DA/SA guns showed me that if I would make the transition I could become competent with some practice. So that’s not a concern.

HK P30sk V1 LEM – 1lb 9.0oz empty mag

Tactical Implications and fudge factor

At about the same time, I was thinking about Zen and the Art of Not Shooting. Prior to this time, I was almost always practicing my draw to a shot. Then I realized that most defensive gun uses are non-shooting events. So it might be worth having another neural pathway set that ends in a strong low ready and an indexed finger, ready to issue commands. This lesson was driven home by my training with Claude Werner, as well as Shivworks AMIS course. A double action gun allows us a margin of safety here if our finger gets confused during the presentation.

Closing

This post is already long enough so I’ll wrap here. If anyone is interested, I’ll do another post to list of the guns I’ve tried and experimented with over the last few years. I have pretty much settled on my favorites for different applications, and I can also outline why I sold the ones I did. It’s been a revolving door, but I’m happy where I am.

I think the TL;DR of this whole post is: It’s not just about the shooting, and those things are more important anyway.

Gear Review: Summer Test of Zulu Bravo Kydex J-frame (A)IWB Holster

My friend Matt at Zulu Bravo Kydex was working up some revisions to his J-Frame kydex holster and was kind enough to send one to me. I was looking for something to house my Hot-Rod J-Frame while I did my thing this summer. This holster proved to be truly excellent for this role.

Link to Buy Zulu Bravo Kydex J-Frame (A)IWB holster

ZBK J-Frame Holster. Discreet Carry Concepts belt clip. Note: bump near trigger guard to help tuck butt into body

Perceived Need for This Holster

So, we all can agree that a J-Frame is about as concealable as a capable handgun can get. You can pocket carry, ankle carry, fanny pack carry, shoulder holster carry, thunderwear carry, Clip-Draw carry, and you can (A)IWB and OWB carry. They are versatile and people tend to reach for them in the hotter months for convenience and comfort (whether they admit it or not).

My Hot-Rod J (The 640) is a bit heavier than some other offerings and I wanted a holster that I could clip and go on my summer duties. A lot of which involve running around with a 6 year old and occasionally wrestling with him. A protected trigger is important for me.

I’m in gym shorts and gi pants more than I’m in pants with belt loops. As a result, I prefer spring steel clips for my carry guns, which I find to be sufficient to keep the holster in the pants when I draw and stays put during gun grapples (which I perceive as the benchmark for retention).

This was my general need. Zulu Bravo Kydex delivers.

CNC forming makes for accurate and repeatable retention. No adjustment is necessary. Velcro foam pad and extended length allows to grip to tuck the perfect amount.

What A Holster Must Do

  • Cover and protect the trigger guard
  • Cleanly release the gun when drawn
  • Stay Open to allow one handed holstering
  • Retain the gun during anticipated physical activity
  • Allow a full firing grip while gun is seated
  • Be stable on pants to allow repeatable indexing of draw

This holster meets all these criteria easily.

Accurate molding negates need for retention adjustment. It’s ideal for my needs.

Details That Make This Holster Excellent

  • Spring Steel Clip (like the excellent DCC clips) for easy on/off.
  • Structure to tuck butt into the torso to aid in concealment.
  • Bright color to allow visual check that no foreign material is in the throat of holster. You’ll never convince me that a no-look holster is the ideal technique for a regular person.
  • Ability to accept a muzzle pad to aid comfort, increase safety of holstering via angle, and drive the top of the gun into the body for concealment. Also note the muzzle portion of the holster is longer than most J-Frame barrels. This aids concealment and prevents ‘flop over’ the belt.
Bright interior looks attractive and allows user to visually confirm there isn’t foreign material in the throat of the holster.

Again, the fine details and careful craftsmanship make this worth every penny. Having the right gear means you’re more likely to carry your gun, and more able to readily access it under stress.

Recommended.

Buy Yours Here.